(done - to some extend) Undo/Redo cabability

[SirQUK]

@DVD GOD if this is indeed true, it would make for more efficient processing for sure, but i am not a programmer, only dimad can say wether this would work, though your idea is very interesting and appealing

[DVDGOD]

I think it's one of the best ways to edit/strip a DVD doing it VTS by VTS as back in the days I stripped quite a few DVD's ('During the War' ) and would check my work after each and every step I know Remake works direct from the DVD but imagine a pre-ripped DVD and all it needed was to strip a few trailers and warnings but too many to use the replace block option why process the whole 7-8GB again? when you can modify just the VTS you will affect as I said, allowing original folder modification will also allow for better end compatibility results as users will be aware of exactly which VTS (Menu or Title) is affecting them when things go wrong and find it much easy to isolate the problem. I'm sure many users will welcome this time saving feature along with getting better results with less effort even if you did work from the DVD and things go wrong then to fix anything you would have to rip the DVD again when processing whereas if you were allowed to process just one VTS, you could use the DVD as the source and tell it to overwrite the already ripped VTS on your HD I do hope you guys can follow what I'm jibbering on about. Maybe some of you are veteran IFOEditor's

[DimadSoft]

[pak2]

Sorry to bump this, but it got lost in the shuffle and I did want to know. For restores --> Will there be a way to identify hidden blocks and/or view their original content? The current version does not label blocks in the viewer and, when a block is "hidden" in the edit interface, it's content can no longer be viewed. That's very inconvenient for locating material, particularly for deciding what to restore. It's not clear why it is necessary to prevent the viewing of original content in "hidden" blocks. The original files haven't been altered and DRM is just recording what it will do when it exports the disk. Would it be workable to simply toggle the status of blocks to "hidden" and show the resulting size, but not prevent the ability to view the original content. The user then has information to assess edit decisions. Paul[/u]

[DimadSoft]

[pak2]

[djelimon]

[DimadSoft]

[quote="djelimon"]

[MackemX]

Hiya all , I got my old username back now and I'm no longer DVDGOD not everyone can process direct from a DVD due to not having AnyDVD or similar and I'm not sure DVD43 works 100%. I did also notice that it didn't fully decrypt the DVD on some occasions when I tested it last year but maybe it's been updated. Others like to rip numerous DVD's and then play with them afterwards when they have more time . Having the option to modify within a DVD folder would be an excellent feature that would allow even faster modifying in some cases. Ifoedit worked on original files and all I used to do was remove the originals and replace them with the processed. If it didnt work then delete the processed files and replace the originals and process it again instead of ripping again. As SirQUK knows my ripping days are over (LOL , as I just stay in the DVD backup world out of interest rather than to make backups. Once the files are ripped, copying HD to HD is faster than ripping again DVDStripper basically remapped the cells it was removing and kept them nice and safe for restoring if required. It remembered which cells needed removing and updated the GUI as required but the originals were always intact right until clicking process MenuModder worked similar but it allowed the user to go back after processing and restore any or all of the buttons even after the original file had been modified as only the modified data had been stored and not the whole VOB. It would only look at the relevant info in the VOB which is a small percentage of the file. The guy who wrote MenuModder for me in less than a week knew nothing about DVD's but he understand how I wanted it to work and how valuable the restore feature was I presume Pak2 was referring to something similar to those kind of restore features and by the sounds of the above its looking good for Remake . I would still say messing with the original is OK as long as you make a partial/full backup (via file shifting or partial file saving) that can put it back to original state As I don't know exactly how Remake updates/modifies the files then I cannot really comment but if given the choice I know what I would do to make things simple and fast the good thing is, DVDRemake has just about everything you need to play with DVD's and can only get better

[CDR-Zone.COM]